How to use “since”

“Since” can be an expression of time, and it can mean “because”.

“Since” as a time expression

When used to express time, the word “since” means:
— from a time in the past until the present
— from a time in the past until another time in the past.

1. From a time in the past until the present

Because of its relationship with time “since” must be used with the correct verb tense. Have a look at these examples of a common mistake:

WRONG
He is out of the office since you last phoned.
As you may recall, the Paris office assists us with this project since it started.
Mr Jones is employed by the Company since September 2016.

In these three sentences the writers have made the mistake of using the Present Simple tense (is / assists / is employed) instead of the Present Perfect tense.

RIGHT
He has been out of the office since you last phoned.
As you may recall, the Paris office has assisted us with this project since it started.
Mr Jones has been employed by the Company since September 2016.

Note that these examples follow this pattern:
Present Perfect tense in the main clause and Past tense (or a date in the past) after “since”.

More examples:
No Public Authority or third party has raised any claims or allegations under Clause 4.1 since the Agreement was signed.

Since he joined the firm as a junior associate in 1998, he has become one of the most highly regarded lawyers in his field.

(Since joining… is an alternative structure that may be used in this type of sentence.)

In all sentences of this type you must use the Present Perfect tense in the main clause. However, the rule that you use the Past tense after “since” is flexible. Sometimes we can use the Present Perfect here as well. For example:

The department has been extremely busy since we have had an office in Mumbai.
I’ve been feeling much better since I’ve been taking more exercise.

We use the Past tense after “since” when we refer to a point in time in the past, and we use the Present Perfect after “since” when we refer to a period of time from the past until the present. We could rewrite the above two examples to refer to points in time (and use the Past tense after “since”) as follows:

The department has been extremely busy since we opened an office in Mumbai.
I’ve been feeling much better since I started taking more exercise.

2. From a time in the past until another time in the past

“Since” can also be used to express time from a starting point in the past until an end point in the past. Such sentences may follow this pattern:

Past Perfect tense in the main clause and Past tense after “since”.

We were sorry to lose MaxCo when they ceased operations in Poland in 2016. They had been a client of ours since they entered the country in 2003.

In 2013 I was asked to direct the company’s promotional film. I had not done anything like that since I worked in TV advertising in 1993.

When I arrived I realised that they had been in the meeting since 9 am.

It is also possible to use the pattern Past Perfect tense in the main clause and Past Perfect tense after “since”. For example:

It had been 20 years since I had directed any kind of film.

3. “Ever since”

You can add stress to “since” by adding “ever”.

Our two senior partners have known each other ever since they were at primary school.

He moved to London in 1994 and he has been living there ever since.

4. Do NOT use “since” to express present time, future time or general time

Note that in all the above examples, “since” is used to describe past time. When used to express time, “since” can ONLY be used in this way.

WRONG
Present
We want the office to start operating since now, or by the end of June at the latest.

Future
I’ll be in the bar since 7 o’clock this evening.

General time
The licence-granting procedure should not take longer than 90 days since the submission of the application.

Instead use “from”:

RIGHT
Present
We want the office to start operating from now, or by the end of June at the latest.

Future
I’ll be in the bar from 7 o’clock this evening.

General time
The licence-granting procedure should not take longer than 90 days from the submission of the application.

5. Do NOT use “since” to express duration

WRONG
The Landlord may terminate the Agreement with immediate effect if the Tenant is in arrears with payments since three months.

Although we would usually expect a decision within six weeks of making an application, the Claimant has now been waiting since ten weeks.

Instead use “for”:

RIGHT
The Landlord may terminate the Agreement with immediate effect if the Tenant is in arrears with payments for three months.

Although we would usually expect a decision within six weeks of making an application, the Claimant has now been waiting for ten weeks.

Another common mistake

WRONG
He worked at Microsoft since 2003 to 2006.

RIGHT
He worked at Microsoft from 2003 to 2006.

Do not use “since” with “to”. Use “from” and “to” or “from” and “until”. Another example:

He worked at the company from the moment he qualified until his retirement.

WRONG
According to the statement, no accidents at work or on the way to or from work have occurred since 2006 until now.

RIGHT
According to the statement, no accidents at work or on the way to or from work have occurred since 2006.

Because “since” — and the Present Perfect tense — incorporate “until now” into their meanings, including “until now” in the above sentence is not necessary.

“Since” meaning “because”

We do not recommend the course of action you propose since there is a risk that the employee will refer the matter to court.

This usage of “since” is rather formal, and may be ambiguous in some sentences because “since” is more commonly used to express time. Consider this example:

We have analysed the tax aspects of the transaction since we were instructed to do so.

This could mean “We have analysed the tax aspects because we were instructed to do so” or “We have been analysing the tax aspects from the time we were instructed to do so”.

As a result, I recommend using “because” or “as” instead of “since”.

 

Advertisements
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

How to use hyphens and dashes

A hyphen is a short line used in compound words and double-barrelled names. There’s one there in “double-barrelled”, which is a compound word. Hyphens don’t usually have spaces before or after them.

A dash is a long line used as a punctuation symbol. It acts in a similar way to commas or brackets to separate a piece of text — like this. Dashes do usually have spaces before and after them.

Hyphens in compound words

WRONG
The court requested BIG Polska S.A. to deliver the files of the claims — handling proceedings.

RIGHT
The court requested BIG Polska S.A. to deliver the files of the claims-handling proceedings.

WRONG
Her name is Anna Posonby — Smythe

RIGHT
Her name is Anna Posonby-Smythe

In recent decades the hyphen has been going out of fashion. Compound words like “land-owner” or “co-operation”, which always used to require a hyphen, are now commonly written “landowner” and “cooperation”. The idea that “lifesciences”, “knowhow” or “healthcare” are routinely written as one word might still have the power to shock members of the older generation.

However, some compound words will always need hyphens. The example I use above is “claims-handling”. The alternative — “claimshandling” — is unreadable because of how we normally read “sh”. The rule here is that you should use a hyphen when you link two or more words to make a compound modifier. A modifier adds information to another word like an adjective. In the above example the word “proceedings” is modified by “claims-handling”. Here are some other examples:

a business-class ticket
a two-week notice of termination
third-party insurance
a steel-producing plant
a five-year-old boy
a free-of-charge service
a personal-data processor
a light-grey car

Obviously none of these compound modifiers could be written as one word.

The importance of the hyphen is illustrated by the last two examples. While “a light-grey car” only describes the car’s colour, “a light grey car” is a light car (i.e. a small road car as opposed to a larger vehicle), which is grey in colour. Similarly “a personal-data processor” is someone who processes personal data, while “a personal data processor” is a data processor who works only for one particular person.

Hyphens in numbers

When writing numbers like 42, 67 or 99 in words, always use a hyphen:

forty-two
sixty-seven
ninety-nine

Numbers such as 2,456,887 should therefore be written in words as follows:

Two million, four hundred and fifty-six thousand, eight hundred and eighty-seven.

Hyphens and prefixes

Use of hyphens with prefixes is a difficult area. Words like “pre-war”, “re-live”, “non-compete” and “anti-abortion” need them, but words like “prejudge”, “reinsure”, “nonviolent” and “antisocial” do not.

The rule is rather a vague one: if the word looks OK and reads OK without a hyphen, don’t use one. Otherwise put one in.

A good example of where one is necessary is “re-send”. The past tense is “re-sent”. “Resent” means something entirely different. E.g. “I resent your attitude”, i.e. I don’t like/do not accept your attitude.

Dashes

Dashes are mainly used to separate pieces of text called strong interruptions. (Commas are used in the same way to separate weak interruptions.) Here are some examples:

The company has fulfilled all its tax obligations — at least that’s what the CEO says.

We finally completed the transaction yesterday — after six long months of negotiations.

If the strong interruption comes in the middle of the sentence you need a pair of dashes:

The documents — enclosed for your convenience — show that the evidence so far presented is not complete.

Remember to include a space before and after the dash.

How to type them

In Microsoft Word, the hyphen/underscore key (between “0” and “=” on the keyboard) produces a hyphen.

However, it will automatically turn into a dash when you press the space bar after the word that follows it, provided that there is also a space before and after the hyphen.

But you have to write something after the hyphen.

You can also make a dash by using Ctrl “-” (on the number keypad) or Alt + 0150 (also using the number keypad).

PowerPoint or Outlook may behave like Word — depending on the version you’re using. Alternatively you may wish to adopt the American convention of typing two hyphens to denote a dash.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

How to translate “ujawnić”

“Ujawnić” seems to have various meanings and can be translated into numerous different words in English. Unfortunately most people regularly choose the wrong word.

Here’s a typical example:

POLISH
W dziale I-Sp księgi wieczystej nr WA4M/00847639/5 ujawnione zostało prawo użytkowania wieczystego o okresie użytkowania do 5 grudnia 2089 roku, a nadto wpisane są uprawnienia wynikające z prawa ujawnionego w dziale III innych ksiąg wieczystych. 

WRONG
In Section I of land and mortgage register no. WA4M/00847639/5 a right of perpetual usufruct has been disclosed for the period until 5 December 2089. Entitlements arising from the right revealed in section III of other land and mortgage registers have also been entered.

“Ujawnić” is commonly used in references to land and mortgage registers (and other public registers) and is usually translated as either “reveal” or “disclose”.

“Reveal” is always incorrect as it means “to make something known that was previously hidden or secret”. So if you were to reveal something in the land and mortgage register you would be uncovering information that was already there. This is not what “ujawnić” means in this context.

“Disclose” can have the same meaning as “reveal”, but is also used in legal contexts to mean “to make public”. A company can be required, for example, to disclose certain financial information. So in some contexts “ujawnić” does mean “disclose”, but not in all contexts.

If you are talking about adding new information to a public register, then use “enter” or “register”.

If you are referring to information that is already in a public register, you can usually also use “enter” or “register”, as well as “list”, “evidence”, “give”, “provide” or simply “is”.

So I would correct the above example as follows:

RIGHT
In Section I of land and mortgage register no. WA4M/00847639/5 a right of perpetual usufruct has been entered for the period until 5 December 2089. Entitlements arising from a right entered in section III of other land and mortgage registers have also been entered.

Using “entered” twice in the second half of the sentence is rather awkward. The example could be entirely rewritten as follows:

EVEN BETTER
Section I of land and mortgage register no. WA4M/00847639/5 evidences a right of perpetual usufruct for the period until 5 December 2089. Entitlements arising from a right entered in section III of other land and mortgage registers are also listed.

Only use “disclose” when you’re talking about adding information to a public register in order to reflect a change of status (e.g. changes in ownership, transfers of title etc.). For example:

If the preliminary sale agreement is concluded with the Seller we recommend registering / disclosing the Company’s claim resulting from the preliminary agreement in the LMRs kept for the Properties. This will be beneficial for the Company, as disclosing such claim in the land and mortgage register will result in the claim’s effectiveness against all parties, including subsequent owners of the property.

More examples:

WRONG
The name of the representative is disclosed in the commercial register of the National Court Register.

RIGHT
The name of the representative is given in the commercial register of the National Court Register.
The name of the representative is provided in the commercial register of the National Court Register.
The name of the representative is in the commercial register of the National Court Register.

WRONG
In Section II of land and mortgage register no. WA4M/00437480/5, the State Treasury is disclosed as the owner of the land, whereas the Company is disclosed as a perpetual usufructuary of the land and the owner of a building constituting separate real property.

RIGHT
In Section II of land and mortgage register no. WA4M/00993564/5, the State Treasury is listed as the owner of the land, whereas the Company is registered as a perpetual usufructuary of the land and the owner of a building constituting separate real property.

 WRONG
All easements must be established within 30 days of signing this agreement and revealed in the relevant land and mortgage registers.

 RIGHT
All easements must be established within 30 days of signing this agreement and disclosed in the relevant land and mortgage registers.

 

 

Posted in Dla Polaków | Tagged | Leave a comment

The difference between countable and uncountable nouns (unit and mass nouns)

Distinguishing between countable nouns (unit nouns) and uncountable nouns (mass nouns) can be very difficult. This area is the source of many mistakes.

Unit nouns have two forms, singular and plural: e.g. a chair, chairs.

You can say 1 chair, 2 chairs, 3 chairs etc. This is why unit nouns are also called countable nouns.

Mass nouns only have one form: e.g. furniture, clothes.

So you can’t say 1 furniture, 2 furnitures, 3 furnitures etc. This is why mass nouns are also called uncountable nouns.

Mass nouns cannot be used with a/an.

WRONG: a furniture

Mass nouns are fixed as singular or plural.

RIGHT: furniture, clothes

WRONG: furnitures, a clothe

However, it may be possible to use “a piece of / an item of” for singular and “some” for plural.

RIGHT: a piece of furniture, some furniture  /  an item of clothing, some clothes

You can use e.g. the furniture for both singular and plural references.

 

Unit nouns usually refer to one or many separate items or units. E.g. a chair/chairs, an office/offices, a client/clients, etc.

Mass nouns usually refer to:

  • ideas, concepts (e.g. approval, employment)
  • substances (e.g. meat, metal)
  • liquids (e.g. water, beer)
  • powders (e.g. dust, sugar)

Some words may be either a unit noun or a mass noun, e.g. chicken 

  • Unit: My parents keep chickens. (birds)
  • Mass: I don’t usually eat chicken. (meat)

Compare:

  • I found a piece of chicken in my soup.” (mass = a piece of meat)
  • I found a piece of a chicken in my soup.” (unit = a piece of a bird)

 

There are 4 types of mass nouns:

  1. Singular nouns that are always mass nouns
  2. Plural nouns that are always mass nouns
  3. Nouns that can be unit nouns or mass nouns and have the same meaning
  4. Nouns that can be unit nouns or mass nouns but have different meanings

1. Singular nouns that are always mass nouns

These nouns have no plural form.

Examples:

  • furniture
  • equipment
  • advice
  • information

In many languages information is a unit noun, and has both singular and plural forms. This is NOT the case in English.

As a result mistakes with information are very common.

WRONG: The informations that you sent us in your last email are out of date.

RIGHT: The information that you sent us in your last email is out of date.

2. Plural nouns that are always mass nouns

These nouns have no singular form. They take the plural verb form (“are”, not “is”) except for “news” which takes “is”.

Examples:

  • clothes
  • trousers
  • scissors
  • thanks
  • news
  • customs
  • arms (i.e. weapons)
  • remains

3. Nouns that can be unit nouns or mass nouns and have the same meaning

Examples:

coffee

  • Unit: Can I get you a coffee?
  • Mass: I’ve spilt coffee all over my keyboard.

agreement

  • Unit: An agreement was signed on 25 July 2014.
  • Mass: The parties are not in agreement on this matter.

business

  • Unit: He owns three different businesses.
  • Mass: Mumbai is a rapidly growing centre for business.

translation

  • Unit: We will send you an English translation by COB.
  • Mass: Her experience includes legal translation.

improvement

  • Unit: We have made some improvements to the document.
  • Mass: Recently we have seen some improvement in the economic conditions.

experience

  • Unit: My secondment to London was a really valuable experience.
  • Mass: I gained valuable experience from my time in London.

4. Nouns that can be unit nouns or mass nouns but have different meanings

Examples:

notice

  • Unit: The company has put up over 50 notices in various locations on the premises. (informational signs)
  • Mass: In accordance with his contract, the employee was given one month’s notice. (prior warning)

control

  • Unit: The pilot sat down at the controls. (knobs and switches)
  • Mass: Since he retired he has been reluctant to relinquish control of the company. (command, domination)

interest

  • Unit: He has acquired an interest in the company. (a share)
  • Mass: Money deposited in a savings account earns interest.

 

Exceptions

Native English speakers play with the language by using nouns that are normally unit nouns as mass nouns for humorous effect.

E.g. The IT guys are installing a new hard drive. My desk is all covered in computer! => Computer as substance.

Picture1

The opposite – i.e. using mass nouns as unit nouns – is common among businesspeople and lawyers.

E.g. arbitrations, consents, coverages, expenditures, inactions, insurances, litigations, trainings.

 

Quantifiers

Quantifiers are words and phrases used to indicate quantity. Below is a list showing quantifiers that are different for unit and mass nouns.

More, most, some, any, all, a lot of, enough, no are used with both unit and mass nouns.

Quantifiers used with unit nouns

  • a number of coins
  • few seats
  • a few friends
  • fewer rooms
  • many dogs
  • each / every document
  • several desks

Quantifiers used with mass nouns

  • an amount of money
  • little space
  • a little help
  • less accommodation
  • much noise
  • all documentation
  • some furniture

 

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

“Prepare for” or “prepare to”?

WRONG
She spent three hours preparing to the court hearing.

RIGHT
She spent three hours preparing for the court hearing.

This is a very common mistake. But “prepare” is not always followed by “for”. Sometimes “to” is correct.

The rule is as follows:

Prepare for + noun (where “for” is a preposition)

Prepare to + verb (where “to” is an infinitive marker)

Examples:

Prepare for + noun

We will need some time to prepare for the meeting.

He clearly had not prepared for the interview – he couldn’t give decent answers to even the most basic questions.

My son is having extra Maths lessons to prepare for the exam.

You can also prepare somebody for something, e.g. Have you prepared your witness for the hearing?

Prepare to + verb

The instructor opened the aeroplane door and gave my parachute one final check. “Prepare to jump”, he said.

There’s going to be a fire drill in ten minutes. Prepare to evacuate the building.

The above examples have a literal meaning – “prepare” means “prepare”. But very often “prepare to + verb” has the idiomatic meaning “to be willing to do something”, as in the following examples:

He said he was prepared to listen to all opinions, but he didn’t care about what I had to say.

I am prepared to do anything to help that is within the law. But I’m not prepared to do anything illegal.

We are not prepared to pay any further expenses.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The “family is” or the “family are”?

Collective nouns are words that describe groups of people or things, e.g. “family” or “team”. Grammatically they are singular, but as they describe more than one individual, they may also take the plural form of a verb or use a plural pronoun.

For example, do we say “The family is arriving tomorrow” or “The family are arriving tomorrow”?

Is a family “it” or “they”?

The answer depends on whether you’re using British or American English, and on the emphasis you wish to make.

Very generally, in British English collective nouns are commonly treated as plurals, e.g. The government are debating the tax proposal. While in American English they take the singular verb form, e.g. The government is debating the tax proposal.

Usage of singular or plural also depends on whether you are emphasising the individuals in the group or the group as a single entity.

The below examples emphasise the individual members of the collective nouns rather than the collection as a single entity:

The management board were unable to agree with each other.
The team were walking through the gate in ones and twos.
The audience haven’t all arrived yet.
Not all the staff are happy about the new arrangements.

These examples emphasise the collective noun as a single entity:

The management board gave its consent.
The team was playing like a well-oiled machine.
The audience is ready for the concert to begin.
The staff accepts the new arrangements.

Other common collective nouns:

committee
company
group
class
jury
tribe
enemy
army
couple

Exceptions:

Police – always takes the plural: “Police are” Always refer to the police as “they”.

Number – when using the phrase “a number of” to mean “several” – use the plural.
E.g. A number of options were presented.
 A number of students have fallen ill.

When using the phrase “the number” to mean “the amount” – use the singular.
E.g. The number of protestors was astonishing.
The huge number of people arriving at the event has taken the organisers by complete surprise.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Communication fail :)

Conversation overheard in a lift:

English businessman – So, what does your company do?
Polish businessman – Boring.
E – Excuse me?
P – Boring.
E – [blank stare]
P – It is mine company.
E – Oh, I see – your own company! Ha ha! You find it boring?
P – Yes. We find much boring.
E – Well, I’m sorry to hear that. Maybe it’s time you did something else.
P – No… There is much boring in Poland.
E – Oh come on! It’s not that bad!

“Boring” is a term used in mining and mechanical engineering which means drilling or making holes. The Polish man works for a successful mining company. The Englishman doesn’t understand any of that!

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments